FreeRTOS Support Archive
The FreeRTOS support forum is used to obtain active support directly from Real
Time Engineers Ltd. In return for using our top quality software and services for
free, we request you play fair and do your bit to help others too! Sign up
to receive notifications of new support topics then help where you can.
This is a read only archive of threads posted to the FreeRTOS support forum.
The archive is updated every week, so will not always contain the very latest posts.
Use these archive pages to search previous posts. Use the Live FreeRTOS Forum
link to reply to a post, or start a new support thread.
[FreeRTOS Home] [Live FreeRTOS Forum] [FAQ] [Archive Top] [September 2015 Threads]
Hi all,
I'm using ST's CubeMX implementation on a F4 discovery board. I use ST's USB middlewares with FreeRTOS.
When I get a special OutputReport from PC side I have to answer nearly immediately (in 10-15 ms). Currently I cannot achieve this timing and it seems my high priority tasks can interrupt the USB callback. What do you think, is it possible? Because it's generated code I'm not sure but can I increase the priority of the USB interrupt (if there is any)?
Thank you,
David
10 to 15 ms is very slow, so I'm sure its possible.
Where is the USB callback function called from? If it is an interrupt then it cannot be interrupted by high priority RTOS tasks. Any non interrupt code (whether you are using an RTOS or not) can only run if no interrupts are running.
Without knowing the control flow in your application its hard to know what to suggest. How is the OutputReport communicated to you? By an interrupt, a message from another task, or some other way?
The callback which receive the data from PC is called from the OTGFSIRQHandler (it's the part of the HALPCDIRQHandler function). I think the problem is SysTickHandler's priority is higher than OTGFSIRQHandler and it's cannot be modified, but the scheduler shouldn't interrupt the OTGFSIRQHandler with any task handled by the scheduler. Am I wrong that the scheduler can interrupt the OTGFS_IRQHandler?
Interestingly, there is a massive "return to roots" movement. Ancient superfoods like millets, turmeric, and moringa—staples in grandmothers' kitchens for centuries—are being rebranded as modern wellness essentials. Yoga, once a spiritual practice, is now a daily fitness pillar for the urban Indian woman seeking balance in a chaotic world. The Digital Shift and Self-Expression
This connectivity has also fueled a shift in social perspectives. Discussions around body positivity, financial independence, and late-age marriage are no longer taboo. The modern Indian woman is using her voice to redefine traditional "norms," choosing a life path that prioritizes her personal aspirations alongside her cultural duties. Conclusion
Food is the language of love in India. The lifestyle of an Indian woman often revolves around the kitchen, but the approach has changed. While traditional slow-cooked meals are reserved for weekends, the weekday diet has become more global.
Yet, this progress brings the "double burden." Many Indian women balance demanding careers with the primary responsibility for household management. This has given rise to a new lifestyle focused on efficiency—the "superwoman" trope is common, though younger generations are increasingly advocating for shared domestic responsibilities and mental health awareness. Culinary Heritage and Modern Health
The explosion of affordable internet has democratized the Indian woman's lifestyle. From rural artisans selling jewelry on Instagram to "Mom-bloggers" sharing parenting tips on YouTube, digital spaces have become the new community squares.
For many, life is defined by collective joy. Festivals like Diwali, Eid, or Karwa Chauth aren't just religious observances; they are social anchors. Even in modern households, the woman often acts as the "cultural custodian," ensuring that traditional recipes, rituals, and languages are preserved and passed on to the next generation. The Sartorial Spectrum: From Saris to Streetwear
Thank you for the answer, I think I'm a bit confused with the Cortex ISR priorities :-)
What I can observe is if I use a much higher osDelay in my high priority task I can respond for the received USB message much faster. This is why I think tasks can mess up with my OTG interrupt.
Copyright (C) Amazon Web Services, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.